<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 118 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45934</link>
    <description>Rule 57Q defines capital goods broadly for Modvat credit, covering machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools and appliances used to produce or process goods or alter substances in manufacturing, together with specified components, spares, accessories, moulds, dies, generating sets and weigh-bridges. Eligibility depends on the statutory user requirement and a functional nexus with manufacturing or factory use. A user-based factual inquiry may be relevant where an item has mixed deployment, but a new objection without a factual foundation before lower authorities does not warrant remand. The Revenue&#039;s broad challenge to credit therefore failed, and the credit allowed on the disputed items remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 118 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45934</link>
      <description>Rule 57Q defines capital goods broadly for Modvat credit, covering machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools and appliances used to produce or process goods or alter substances in manufacturing, together with specified components, spares, accessories, moulds, dies, generating sets and weigh-bridges. Eligibility depends on the statutory user requirement and a functional nexus with manufacturing or factory use. A user-based factual inquiry may be relevant where an item has mixed deployment, but a new objection without a factual foundation before lower authorities does not warrant remand. The Revenue&#039;s broad challenge to credit therefore failed, and the credit allowed on the disputed items remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>