<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45931</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the learned single Judge in a case concerning the import of goods under Advance Licences. The Court ruled that the petitioner, as a purchaser of the licences, was not obligated to prove a nexus between the imported goods and those exported by the original licensees since the export obligations had been fulfilled. The Court emphasized that once the export obligation was met, customs authorities could not demand further proof of nexus. The Court dismissed appeals challenging this decision, directing authorities to proceed with assessment orders without considering disputed endorsements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:14:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 107 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45931</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the learned single Judge in a case concerning the import of goods under Advance Licences. The Court ruled that the petitioner, as a purchaser of the licences, was not obligated to prove a nexus between the imported goods and those exported by the original licensees since the export obligations had been fulfilled. The Court emphasized that once the export obligation was met, customs authorities could not demand further proof of nexus. The Court dismissed appeals challenging this decision, directing authorities to proceed with assessment orders without considering disputed endorsements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>