https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776805 Interim injunction in a composite-mark dispute depends on a holistic comparison from the standpoint of the average consumer with imperfect recollection. The court held that the marks, labels, packaging, colour scheme, typography, bottle design and overall trade dress of the rival products were materially different, so there was no prima facie deceptive similarity, infringement or passing off. The shared word "PRIDE" was common to trade and had not been shown to have acquired exclusive source significance or secondary meaning in favour of the appellants. Claims based on embossing and on combining features from different marks were also found unreliable, so interlocutory relief was refused. en-us Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776805 Interim injunction in a composite-mark dispute depends on a holistic comparison from the standpoint of the average consumer with imperfect recollection. The court held that the marks, labels, packaging, colour scheme, typography, bottle design and overall trade dress of the rival products were materially different, so there was no prima facie deceptive similarity, infringement or passing off. The shared word "PRIDE" was common to trade and had not been shown to have acquired exclusive source significance or secondary meaning in favour of the appellants. Claims based on embossing and on combining features from different marks were also found unreliable, so interlocutory relief was refused. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776805