<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1003 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776815</link>
    <description>Regular bail in a money laundering prosecution was sought on the basis of alleged violation of liberty, delay in trial, and long incarceration, with the requirements of section 45 of the PMLA in issue. The SC found no ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order and dismissed the SLP. It also stated that the observations made were only prima facie and would have no bearing on future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1003 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776815</link>
      <description>Regular bail in a money laundering prosecution was sought on the basis of alleged violation of liberty, delay in trial, and long incarceration, with the requirements of section 45 of the PMLA in issue. The SC found no ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order and dismissed the SLP. It also stated that the observations made were only prima facie and would have no bearing on future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>