<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1004 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776816</link>
    <description>A security deposit made as a condition for permitting travel abroad was treated as no longer required once the applicant complied with the travel conditions, undertook the within the permitted period, and returned to India with the passport deposited with the investigating agency. On that basis, the retained amount, together with any accrued interest, was directed to be released to the applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1004 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776816</link>
      <description>A security deposit made as a condition for permitting travel abroad was treated as no longer required once the applicant complied with the travel conditions, undertook the within the permitted period, and returned to India with the passport deposited with the investigating agency. On that basis, the retained amount, together with any accrued interest, was directed to be released to the applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>