<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1006 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776818</link>
    <description>NCLAT held that admission of a Section 95 IBC application and related ex parte orders dated 06.12.2024 and 09.12.2024 against two personal guarantors (spouses) violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal allowed recall of those orders, set aside the impugned admission, and disposed of the appeal, directing further proceedings to be heard together on the next listed date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 17:00:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1006 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776818</link>
      <description>NCLAT held that admission of a Section 95 IBC application and related ex parte orders dated 06.12.2024 and 09.12.2024 against two personal guarantors (spouses) violated principles of natural justice. The Tribunal allowed recall of those orders, set aside the impugned admission, and disposed of the appeal, directing further proceedings to be heard together on the next listed date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>