<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1015 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776827</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition and upheld the HC&#039;s decision that no substantial question of law arose, thereby affirming suspension of the respondent&#039;s warehousing operations for breach of bonded warehouse conditions and the imposition of the redemption fine and penalty. The Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned HC order, leaving the suspension and financial sanctions in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1015 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776827</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition and upheld the HC&#039;s decision that no substantial question of law arose, thereby affirming suspension of the respondent&#039;s warehousing operations for breach of bonded warehouse conditions and the imposition of the redemption fine and penalty. The Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned HC order, leaving the suspension and financial sanctions in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>