<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1019 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776831</link>
    <description>Delay in filing Form 10B under section 139 was treated as directory, not mandatory, so exemption under section 11 could not be denied solely on that basis. The disallowance was therefore not sustained merely because the form was filed after the prescribed date, and the claim required examination on merits. The matter was restored for fresh factual verification and adjudication of the exemption claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1019 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776831</link>
      <description>Delay in filing Form 10B under section 139 was treated as directory, not mandatory, so exemption under section 11 could not be denied solely on that basis. The disallowance was therefore not sustained merely because the form was filed after the prescribed date, and the claim required examination on merits. The matter was restored for fresh factual verification and adjudication of the exemption claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>