<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1023 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776835</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated on a recorded reason alleging understatement of sale consideration for immovable property could not be sustained where no addition was made on that very ground in the completed reassessment. The reassessment instead proceeded on a different purchase-related addition, so the original basis for reopening did not survive. On that footing, the reopening under sections 147 and 148 was held unsustainable in law, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1023 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776835</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated on a recorded reason alleging understatement of sale consideration for immovable property could not be sustained where no addition was made on that very ground in the completed reassessment. The reassessment instead proceeded on a different purchase-related addition, so the original basis for reopening did not survive. On that footing, the reopening under sections 147 and 148 was held unsustainable in law, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>