<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1050 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776862</link>
    <description>HC set aside the impugned ex parte order for breach of natural justice and declined to impose any deposit condition. The court noted the notices were not served physically and allowed the petitioner&#039;s voluntary deposit of 25% of the tax. The HC directed the respondent to treat the impugned order as a show cause notice, permit the petitioner to file a reply, and undertake fresh consideration in accordance with law. Petition allowed by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1050 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776862</link>
      <description>HC set aside the impugned ex parte order for breach of natural justice and declined to impose any deposit condition. The court noted the notices were not served physically and allowed the petitioner&#039;s voluntary deposit of 25% of the tax. The HC directed the respondent to treat the impugned order as a show cause notice, permit the petitioner to file a reply, and undertake fresh consideration in accordance with law. Petition allowed by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>