https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776863 HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.02.2025 and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, holding that the respondent violated Section 75(4) of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice by confirming demand without affording a personal hearing after the assessee filed a written reply. The petition was allowed by way of remand. en-us Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776863 HC set aside the impugned order dated 26.02.2025 and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration, holding that the respondent violated Section 75(4) of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice by confirming demand without affording a personal hearing after the assessee filed a written reply. The petition was allowed by way of remand. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776863