<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1052 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776864</link>
    <description>HC condoned a 15-day delay and quashed the impugned order dated 10.07.2025 rejecting the appeal. The matter is remitted to the Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits and in accordance with law without reference to limitation. As the appellant had pre-deposited 10% of the disputed tax, the bank account attachment effected under the impugned order is ordered vacated forthwith. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1052 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776864</link>
      <description>HC condoned a 15-day delay and quashed the impugned order dated 10.07.2025 rejecting the appeal. The matter is remitted to the Deputy Commissioner (GST Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits and in accordance with law without reference to limitation. As the appellant had pre-deposited 10% of the disputed tax, the bank account attachment effected under the impugned order is ordered vacated forthwith. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>