https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776869 HC held that email communication of the impugned order sufficed under Section 169 CGST and delay in uploading Form DRC-07 or posting the order on the portal did not render the order time-barred where the order had been communicated to noticees. The impugned order, being appealable, the petitioner was permitted to prefer an appeal under Section 107 CGST and to raise the limitation point therein. Appeals must be filed with the requisite pre-deposit by 30 September 2025; if so filed, they shall not be dismissed on limitation grounds and will be decided on merits. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776869 HC held that email communication of the impugned order sufficed under Section 169 CGST and delay in uploading Form DRC-07 or posting the order on the portal did not render the order time-barred where the order had been communicated to noticees. The impugned order, being appealable, the petitioner was permitted to prefer an appeal under Section 107 CGST and to raise the limitation point therein. Appeals must be filed with the requisite pre-deposit by 30 September 2025; if so filed, they shall not be dismissed on limitation grounds and will be decided on merits. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776869