https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776870 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging an order under the tax statute, concluding the petitioner bypassed available statutory remedies and failed to explain the inordinate delay in approaching the Court. Noting the petitioner's lack of promptness in contesting an order dated 17 August 2024 and objections from the tax department, the Court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Articles 226/227. Reliance was placed on Supreme Court principles limiting writ relief where alternative remedies exist and the petition merely disputes assessment/credit adjustments; petition therefore dismissed. en-us Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2025 08:34:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776870 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging an order under the tax statute, concluding the petitioner bypassed available statutory remedies and failed to explain the inordinate delay in approaching the Court. Noting the petitioner's lack of promptness in contesting an order dated 17 August 2024 and objections from the tax department, the Court declined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Articles 226/227. Reliance was placed on Supreme Court principles limiting writ relief where alternative remedies exist and the petition merely disputes assessment/credit adjustments; petition therefore dismissed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776870