<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 2138 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463250</link>
    <description>CESTAT, Chandigarh (AT) allowed the appeal, holding that fees collected for administrative support to doctors/consultants constituted health care services rather than business support services. Consequently, the appellants were not liable to pay service tax under the Business Support Service category. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and ruled no service tax payable on the administrative support provided in the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:13:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 2138 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463250</link>
      <description>CESTAT, Chandigarh (AT) allowed the appeal, holding that fees collected for administrative support to doctors/consultants constituted health care services rather than business support services. Consequently, the appellants were not liable to pay service tax under the Business Support Service category. The tribunal set aside the impugned orders and ruled no service tax payable on the administrative support provided in the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>