<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1605 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463258</link>
    <description>Management fees for functional and human-resource support remained taxable as fees for technical services because the Most Favoured Nation clause in the India-France DTAA could not import the India-UK DTAA&#039;s make-available requirement without a separate notification. Corporate guarantee fees were not fees for technical services, as providing a guarantee for an associated enterprise&#039;s borrowing is not managerial, technical or consultancy service. Social security contribution reimbursements remained taxable where linked to services, notwithstanding cost-to-cost treatment without markup. Surcharge and education cess could not be separately levied where the treaty rate covered Indian income-tax, including surcharge and substantially similar later taxes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 21:13:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1605 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463258</link>
      <description>Management fees for functional and human-resource support remained taxable as fees for technical services because the Most Favoured Nation clause in the India-France DTAA could not import the India-UK DTAA&#039;s make-available requirement without a separate notification. Corporate guarantee fees were not fees for technical services, as providing a guarantee for an associated enterprise&#039;s borrowing is not managerial, technical or consultancy service. Social security contribution reimbursements remained taxable where linked to services, notwithstanding cost-to-cost treatment without markup. Surcharge and education cess could not be separately levied where the treaty rate covered Indian income-tax, including surcharge and substantially similar later taxes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>