https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91689 ITAT upholds validity of the assessment proceedings: the notice under s.143(2) and accompanying questionnaire were issued after application of mind and are not mechanical; therefore grounds challenging re-assessment notice and service are dismissed. Procedural fairness is affirmed - multiple opportunities to be heard were afforded and no infirmity found. The contention regarding non-acknowledgement of ITR-V was rejected under the principle in s.292B for participating in proceedings without contemporaneous objection. Non-supply of reasons recorded was not fatal where no formal request was made. Substantive relief granted: long-term capital gains from sale of ancestral land must be assessed in HUF capacity, not in the individual's hands. Addition treating declared agricultural income as undisclosed is upheld. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:42:52 +0530 Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:42:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91689 ITAT upholds validity of the assessment proceedings: the notice under s.143(2) and accompanying questionnaire were issued after application of mind and are not mechanical; therefore grounds challenging re-assessment notice and service are dismissed. Procedural fairness is affirmed - multiple opportunities to be heard were afforded and no infirmity found. The contention regarding non-acknowledgement of ITR-V was rejected under the principle in s.292B for participating in proceedings without contemporaneous objection. Non-supply of reasons recorded was not fatal where no formal request was made. Substantive relief granted: long-term capital gains from sale of ancestral land must be assessed in HUF capacity, not in the individual's hands. Addition treating declared agricultural income as undisclosed is upheld. Highlights Income Tax Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:42:52 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91689