<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Intimation under s.143(1) quashed for denying 30-day response; s.10(23C)(iiiac) exemption wrongly disallowed as jurisdictional defect</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91683</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and quashed the intimation under s. 143(1) issued by the DDIT, CPC, Bengaluru. The Tribunal found the intimation invalid as the Revenue issued a query on 26/12/2023 giving the assessee 30 days to respond but passed the s. 143(1) intimation on 29/12/2023 after only two days, treating gross receipts as taxable income and disallowing claimed exemption under s. 10(23C)(iiiac). The Tribunal held this denial of the statutory 30-day response period violated principles of natural justice and constituted a jurisdictional defect, rendering the intimation vitiated in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:34:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Intimation under s.143(1) quashed for denying 30-day response; s.10(23C)(iiiac) exemption wrongly disallowed as jurisdictional defect</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91683</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed the appeal and quashed the intimation under s. 143(1) issued by the DDIT, CPC, Bengaluru. The Tribunal found the intimation invalid as the Revenue issued a query on 26/12/2023 giving the assessee 30 days to respond but passed the s. 143(1) intimation on 29/12/2023 after only two days, treating gross receipts as taxable income and disallowing claimed exemption under s. 10(23C)(iiiac). The Tribunal held this denial of the statutory 30-day response period violated principles of natural justice and constituted a jurisdictional defect, rendering the intimation vitiated in law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:34:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>