<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45909</link>
    <description>An administrative order transferring appeals to Delhi was challenged on the ground that allegations of bias against the CEGAT President required immediate judicial protection. The High Court granted interim relief by staying the impugned transfer order ad interim and issued notice to the CEGAT President to file an affidavit-in-reply, leaving the matter for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:42:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45909</link>
      <description>An administrative order transferring appeals to Delhi was challenged on the ground that allegations of bias against the CEGAT President required immediate judicial protection. The High Court granted interim relief by staying the impugned transfer order ad interim and issued notice to the CEGAT President to file an affidavit-in-reply, leaving the matter for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>