<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 940 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776752</link>
    <description>NCLAT (PB) upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s admission of the Section 7 application and dismissed the appeal, directing CIRP to proceed under the I&amp;B Code and CIRP Regulations, 2016. The Tribunal found the IBC regime exclusive for resolution of the corporate debtor, including real estate entities. Multiple OTS proposals from the appellant and investors were considered but ultimately rejected by the consortium of banks; a prior OTS had been cancelled for non-compliance. Interim orders delaying constitution of the CoC were extended during negotiations, but refusal of settlement by the financial creditors requires continuation of CIRP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 940 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776752</link>
      <description>NCLAT (PB) upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s admission of the Section 7 application and dismissed the appeal, directing CIRP to proceed under the I&amp;B Code and CIRP Regulations, 2016. The Tribunal found the IBC regime exclusive for resolution of the corporate debtor, including real estate entities. Multiple OTS proposals from the appellant and investors were considered but ultimately rejected by the consortium of banks; a prior OTS had been cancelled for non-compliance. Interim orders delaying constitution of the CoC were extended during negotiations, but refusal of settlement by the financial creditors requires continuation of CIRP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>