<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 945 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776757</link>
    <description>ITAT JAIPUR - AT held that spot verification by the TDS wing was invalid for FY 2012-13 and 2013-14 as it lacked the mandatory approval of the Joint Commissioner/Joint Director under the proviso to s.133A; the only sanction produced related to FY 2011-12. Consequently, actions taken and orders under ss.201/201(1A) based on that verification were without authority of law, no cognizance could be taken of the illegal survey, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 945 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776757</link>
      <description>ITAT JAIPUR - AT held that spot verification by the TDS wing was invalid for FY 2012-13 and 2013-14 as it lacked the mandatory approval of the Joint Commissioner/Joint Director under the proviso to s.133A; the only sanction produced related to FY 2011-12. Consequently, actions taken and orders under ss.201/201(1A) based on that verification were without authority of law, no cognizance could be taken of the illegal survey, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>