<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 948 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776760</link>
    <description>Cost-to-cost reimbursement of legal and professional expenses, supported by third-party invoices and accepted on facts as having no markup, was held not to constitute taxable income in the non-resident recipient&#039;s hands under Article 13 of the India-Denmark DTAA. Because the assessment order did not dislodge the reimbursement character and no profit element was shown to be embedded in the receipt, the amount could not be recharacterised as royalty or management fee for treaty taxation. The transfer pricing treatment in the payer&#039;s hands did not change the tax character of the same receipt in the recipient&#039;s hands, and the addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:38:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 948 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776760</link>
      <description>Cost-to-cost reimbursement of legal and professional expenses, supported by third-party invoices and accepted on facts as having no markup, was held not to constitute taxable income in the non-resident recipient&#039;s hands under Article 13 of the India-Denmark DTAA. Because the assessment order did not dislodge the reimbursement character and no profit element was shown to be embedded in the receipt, the amount could not be recharacterised as royalty or management fee for treaty taxation. The transfer pricing treatment in the payer&#039;s hands did not change the tax character of the same receipt in the recipient&#039;s hands, and the addition was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>