<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 980 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776792</link>
    <description>Blocking of an Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017 was directed to be reconsidered by the Commissioner after the writ court found the matter required fresh examination. The petitioner was permitted to file a reply or objection, a personal hearing was fixed, and the authority was required to pass a reasoned order. The writ petition was thus disposed of by remanding the blocking order for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 980 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776792</link>
      <description>Blocking of an Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST Rules, 2017 was directed to be reconsidered by the Commissioner after the writ court found the matter required fresh examination. The petitioner was permitted to file a reply or objection, a personal hearing was fixed, and the authority was required to pass a reasoned order. The writ petition was thus disposed of by remanding the blocking order for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>