<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776797</link>
    <description>HC held second writ petition seeking challenge to retrospective GST registration cancellation not maintainable because identical relief was raised in an earlier writ (W.P. (C) 2555/2025) where the impugned appellate order was already annexed and the earlier petition was dismissed for laches with the petitioner accepting that dismissal. The current petition was rejected; the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedies remain open to be pursued in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 985 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776797</link>
      <description>HC held second writ petition seeking challenge to retrospective GST registration cancellation not maintainable because identical relief was raised in an earlier writ (W.P. (C) 2555/2025) where the impugned appellate order was already annexed and the earlier petition was dismissed for laches with the petitioner accepting that dismissal. The current petition was rejected; the petitioner&#039;s statutory remedies remain open to be pursued in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>