<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 987 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776799</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition for extension of time to reopen adjudication, finding an inordinate delay of about 11 months and no satisfactory explanation for laches. The court declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, holding the petitioner should have pursued statutory remedies within prescribed time and may agitate the factual disputes before the competent GST adjudicating authority. For these reasons the petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:38:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 987 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776799</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition for extension of time to reopen adjudication, finding an inordinate delay of about 11 months and no satisfactory explanation for laches. The court declined to exercise discretionary writ jurisdiction, holding the petitioner should have pursued statutory remedies within prescribed time and may agitate the factual disputes before the competent GST adjudicating authority. For these reasons the petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>