<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2073 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463232</link>
    <description>ITAT held that filing a return in response to notice under s.153A does not bar filing a revised return; s.139(5) applies where not inconsistent with s.153A. The Tribunal found the assessee had discovered an inadvertent error (figures of a different AY), filed the revised return within the time prescribed in the s.153A notice and before completion of assessment, so the revision was valid. Assessment was set aside to give effect to the revised return. Decision against Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2073 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463232</link>
      <description>ITAT held that filing a return in response to notice under s.153A does not bar filing a revised return; s.139(5) applies where not inconsistent with s.153A. The Tribunal found the assessee had discovered an inadvertent error (figures of a different AY), filed the revised return within the time prescribed in the s.153A notice and before completion of assessment, so the revision was valid. Assessment was set aside to give effect to the revised return. Decision against Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>