<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463240</link>
    <description>Writ petition allowed. HC held that approval for reopening assessments cannot be treated as valid if granted by the Principal Commissioner contrary to the statutory scheme relied on in earlier authority; such reliance was impermissible. On that short ground the court quashed the order under section 148A(d) and the notice under section 148, setting aside the impugned reopening.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 20:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1233 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463240</link>
      <description>Writ petition allowed. HC held that approval for reopening assessments cannot be treated as valid if granted by the Principal Commissioner contrary to the statutory scheme relied on in earlier authority; such reliance was impermissible. On that short ground the court quashed the order under section 148A(d) and the notice under section 148, setting aside the impugned reopening.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>