<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (12) TMI 105 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45883</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the respondent the benefit of an exemption notification for their fifth consignment, ruling it was not distinct from prior consignments covered by the same exemption. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:32:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (12) TMI 105 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45883</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the respondent the benefit of an exemption notification for their fifth consignment, ruling it was not distinct from prior consignments covered by the same exemption. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>