https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45880 The Supreme Court addressed issues related to the execution of a decree, withdrawal of funds without security, and contempt of court by both the respondent and the judicial officer. The respondent apologized for the unauthorized withdrawal, citing ignorance of the Supreme Court's order. The judicial officer received a severe reprimand for negligence but was not punished for willful disobedience. The High Court's order was modified to require security for the entire withdrawn amount. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2014 11:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45880 The Supreme Court addressed issues related to the execution of a decree, withdrawal of funds without security, and contempt of court by both the respondent and the judicial officer. The respondent apologized for the unauthorized withdrawal, citing ignorance of the Supreme Court's order. The judicial officer received a severe reprimand for negligence but was not punished for willful disobedience. The High Court's order was modified to require security for the entire withdrawn amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45880