<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Loan violation of Section 269SS doesn&#039;t void debt under Section 138 NI Act; conviction restored on cheque presumption</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91630</link>
    <description>The HC held that a cash loan of Rs. 5 lakhs, though in violation of Section 269SS of the IT Act, does not negate its status as a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the NI Act. The Trial Court&#039;s finding that the loan was unenforceable due to non-compliance with Section 269SS was overturned. The accused admitted signing the cheque, triggering the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act. The claim that the cheque was blank when issued did not discharge the accused&#039;s burden to rebut the presumption. Allegations of forgery were dismissed as minor clerical corrections without prejudice. Consequently, the accused failed to rebut the presumption of liability, and the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 138 NI.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:39:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=844015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Loan violation of Section 269SS doesn&#039;t void debt under Section 138 NI Act; conviction restored on cheque presumption</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91630</link>
      <description>The HC held that a cash loan of Rs. 5 lakhs, though in violation of Section 269SS of the IT Act, does not negate its status as a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the NI Act. The Trial Court&#039;s finding that the loan was unenforceable due to non-compliance with Section 269SS was overturned. The accused admitted signing the cheque, triggering the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act. The claim that the cheque was blank when issued did not discharge the accused&#039;s burden to rebut the presumption. Allegations of forgery were dismissed as minor clerical corrections without prejudice. Consequently, the accused failed to rebut the presumption of liability, and the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 138 NI.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:39:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=91630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>