https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776706 CESTAT ALLAHABAD (AT) dismissed the appeal as time-barred where delay exceeding the prescribed period (more than the two-month filing period plus the one-month condonation limit) was not satisfactorily explained. The Tribunal held the Commissioner (Appeals) correctly refused to condone delay beyond the statutory 30-day extension, leaving the appeal without merit and dismissed. en-us Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:39:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776706 CESTAT ALLAHABAD (AT) dismissed the appeal as time-barred where delay exceeding the prescribed period (more than the two-month filing period plus the one-month condonation limit) was not satisfactorily explained. The Tribunal held the Commissioner (Appeals) correctly refused to condone delay beyond the statutory 30-day extension, leaving the appeal without merit and dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 14 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776706