<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 906 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776718</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur (AT) held that unexplained cash credits claimed as unsecured loans under s.68 were satisfactorily explained by the assessee through ledger accounts, audited financials, bank statements, ITR acknowledgements and sale bills, meeting the tests of identity, capacity and genuineness. A retracted statement obtained during survey/search could not alone sustain additions; reliance on such retraction was rejected following HC precedent. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:39:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 906 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776718</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur (AT) held that unexplained cash credits claimed as unsecured loans under s.68 were satisfactorily explained by the assessee through ledger accounts, audited financials, bank statements, ITR acknowledgements and sale bills, meeting the tests of identity, capacity and genuineness. A retracted statement obtained during survey/search could not alone sustain additions; reliance on such retraction was rejected following HC precedent. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>