https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776733 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was held unsuitable where GST adjudication orders were challenged on a disputed factual matrix involving alleged OTP sharing, operation of the registration by third parties, and suspected fraudulent availment of ITC. The court noted that the record and pleadings indicated possible creation of multiple firms and invoice activity requiring investigation, and that a police inquiry was already underway. Because the controversy depended on unresolved questions of fact and alleged fraud, the writ petitions were not entertained, leaving the petitioner to pursue remedies available in law. en-us Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Aug 2025 08:39:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776733 Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 was held unsuitable where GST adjudication orders were challenged on a disputed factual matrix involving alleged OTP sharing, operation of the registration by third parties, and suspected fraudulent availment of ITC. The court noted that the record and pleadings indicated possible creation of multiple firms and invoice activity requiring investigation, and that a police inquiry was already underway. Because the controversy depended on unresolved questions of fact and alleged fraud, the writ petitions were not entertained, leaving the petitioner to pursue remedies available in law. Case-Laws GST Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776733