https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45866 The High Court held that the proposed questions did arise for consideration and that the Tribunal was required to refer the legal issue concerning extension of Modvat credit on inputs received under an endorsed invoice, where such endorsement was not a prescribed document under Rule 57G(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It treated the matter as fit for reference and directed the Tribunal to forward a statement of case with the relevant materials for decision on the question. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:45:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45866 The High Court held that the proposed questions did arise for consideration and that the Tribunal was required to refer the legal issue concerning extension of Modvat credit on inputs received under an endorsed invoice, where such endorsement was not a prescribed document under Rule 57G(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It treated the matter as fit for reference and directed the Tribunal to forward a statement of case with the relevant materials for decision on the question. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45866