<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 143 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45862</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a customs valuation dispute, directing the Customs Authority to refund the difference between the declared value of goods and the amount already paid. The refund amount of Rs. 2,64,997 was to be remitted within six weeks. The judgment highlighted discrepancies in valuation, confiscation, and disposal of goods, emphasizing the need for a fair resolution for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:32:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 143 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45862</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a customs valuation dispute, directing the Customs Authority to refund the difference between the declared value of goods and the amount already paid. The refund amount of Rs. 2,64,997 was to be remitted within six weeks. The judgment highlighted discrepancies in valuation, confiscation, and disposal of goods, emphasizing the need for a fair resolution for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>