<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 90 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45860</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, operates prospectively. Illegal acts predating its enactment cannot be penalized under this provision. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 90 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45860</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, operates prospectively. Illegal acts predating its enactment cannot be penalized under this provision. The Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>