<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 873 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776685</link>
    <description>Cash deposits treated as unexplained were partly accepted as sourced from sale consideration received under earlier sale deeds, because the deposits showed a temporal nexus with those transactions. The assessee, however, did not satisfactorily discharge the burden of proving all relevant facts before the lower authorities, so the explanation was accepted only in part. The addition was therefore restricted, with relief granted for the balance amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 10:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 873 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776685</link>
      <description>Cash deposits treated as unexplained were partly accepted as sourced from sale consideration received under earlier sale deeds, because the deposits showed a temporal nexus with those transactions. The assessee, however, did not satisfactorily discharge the burden of proving all relevant facts before the lower authorities, so the explanation was accepted only in part. The addition was therefore restricted, with relief granted for the balance amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>