<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 879 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776691</link>
    <description>The ITAT Rajkot held that protective additions under section 69A are temporary and meant to safeguard revenue interests when the real owner of income is uncertain. Since the substantive addition of the same amount was confirmed in the hands of the real owner under section 147 read with sections 144/144B, the protective addition in the assessee&#039;s hands was deleted. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 10:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 879 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776691</link>
      <description>The ITAT Rajkot held that protective additions under section 69A are temporary and meant to safeguard revenue interests when the real owner of income is uncertain. Since the substantive addition of the same amount was confirmed in the hands of the real owner under section 147 read with sections 144/144B, the protective addition in the assessee&#039;s hands was deleted. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>