<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 883 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776695</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai held that the entire cash deposits in the assessee&#039;s bank account, linked to the mosquito net business, could not be treated as unexplained income under section 69A. The assessee&#039;s records, including purchase and sales registers and bank statements, demonstrated the deposits were business-related. However, due to the absence of proper books of account, the Tribunal applied an average net profit rate of 12% on the cash deposits for the relevant year, based on prior years&#039; data, to determine a fair income. Consequently, the addition of all deposits as unexplained income was set aside, and only a part addition based on the estimated profit was confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 10:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 883 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776695</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai held that the entire cash deposits in the assessee&#039;s bank account, linked to the mosquito net business, could not be treated as unexplained income under section 69A. The assessee&#039;s records, including purchase and sales registers and bank statements, demonstrated the deposits were business-related. However, due to the absence of proper books of account, the Tribunal applied an average net profit rate of 12% on the cash deposits for the relevant year, based on prior years&#039; data, to determine a fair income. Consequently, the addition of all deposits as unexplained income was set aside, and only a part addition based on the estimated profit was confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>