<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1493 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463219</link>
    <description>Capacity utilisation adjustment for transfer pricing benchmarking in a start-up manufacturing context is a permissible adjustment where comparables exhibit materially higher capacity utilisation; applying the adjustment increases the assessee&#039;s net comparable profit margin to a level comparable with selected Indian comparables, thereby validating the arm&#039;s length outcome. The transfer pricing officer&#039;s rejection of the capacity utilisation adjustment was reversed on review because the assessee supported the computation methodology, data and precedents; consequently the benchmarking adjustment made by the officer was deleted and the revenue grounds were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1493 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463219</link>
      <description>Capacity utilisation adjustment for transfer pricing benchmarking in a start-up manufacturing context is a permissible adjustment where comparables exhibit materially higher capacity utilisation; applying the adjustment increases the assessee&#039;s net comparable profit margin to a level comparable with selected Indian comparables, thereby validating the arm&#039;s length outcome. The transfer pricing officer&#039;s rejection of the capacity utilisation adjustment was reversed on review because the assessee supported the computation methodology, data and precedents; consequently the benchmarking adjustment made by the officer was deleted and the revenue grounds were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>