<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1472 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463223</link>
    <description>The HC held that the reopening of assessment under Section 148 was invalid as the authorities acted beyond the scope of the Act, proceeding on incorrect facts by treating a land purchase as a sale. The notice and order under Section 148A(d) were quashed, finding the assessee was subjected to unwarranted harassment. The civil writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 21:55:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1472 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463223</link>
      <description>The HC held that the reopening of assessment under Section 148 was invalid as the authorities acted beyond the scope of the Act, proceeding on incorrect facts by treating a land purchase as a sale. The notice and order under Section 148A(d) were quashed, finding the assessee was subjected to unwarranted harassment. The civil writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>