<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 75 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45843</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal after stating that it would approach the Tribunal by way of a review petition in light of the Tribunal&#039;s observations. The Supreme Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The text records only this procedural disposition and does not state any substantive ruling on the central excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:51:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 75 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45843</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal after stating that it would approach the Tribunal by way of a review petition in light of the Tribunal&#039;s observations. The Supreme Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The text records only this procedural disposition and does not state any substantive ruling on the central excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>