<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45832</link>
    <description>The accused was convicted under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act for dealing with smuggled gold biscuits. However, instead of imprisonment, the court ordered probation for two years considering the long duration since the offence and the accused&#039;s age at the time. The order confiscating the gold biscuits to the State of Rajasthan was overturned, directing their return to the Central Government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:23:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45832</link>
      <description>The accused was convicted under Section 135(b)(ii) of the Customs Act for dealing with smuggled gold biscuits. However, instead of imprisonment, the court ordered probation for two years considering the long duration since the offence and the accused&#039;s age at the time. The order confiscating the gold biscuits to the State of Rajasthan was overturned, directing their return to the Central Government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>