https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463213 The SC addressed a service tax demand on the appellant related to villas constructed under a joint development agreement with multiple landowners. The appellant had included the value of developmental rights received from landowners in the assessable value of villas sold. The CESTAT confirmed this inclusion, indicating proper tax compliance. The SC held that the extended period of limitation issue warranted issuance of notice, without deciding on the tax liability itself. en-us Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:57:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463213 The SC addressed a service tax demand on the appellant related to villas constructed under a joint development agreement with multiple landowners. The appellant had included the value of developmental rights received from landowners in the assessable value of villas sold. The CESTAT confirmed this inclusion, indicating proper tax compliance. The SC held that the extended period of limitation issue warranted issuance of notice, without deciding on the tax liability itself. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463213