<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 1662 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463212</link>
    <description>The SC held that the consideration received by the appellant in the form of land rights from landowners was included in the value of villas sold, meaning the developmental rights were accounted for in the assessable value. The revenue&#039;s demand for service tax on the villas constructed under the joint development agreement was thus addressed with reference to this valuation. The SC directed that the matters be listed for hearing on its own priority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:57:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 1662 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463212</link>
      <description>The SC held that the consideration received by the appellant in the form of land rights from landowners was included in the value of villas sold, meaning the developmental rights were accounted for in the assessable value. The revenue&#039;s demand for service tax on the villas constructed under the joint development agreement was thus addressed with reference to this valuation. The SC directed that the matters be listed for hearing on its own priority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>