<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bihar SIR row: SC asks EC to publish details of 65 lakh deleted voters with reasons</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52531</link>
    <description>The electoral authority is ordered to publish the list of electors removed during the special intensive revision with specific reasons for non-inclusion displayed at local offices and widely publicised so affected persons may inspect deletions and approach poll officials with identity evidence for redress; the revisions cite reasons such as death, permanent shift/absence, and duplicate enrolment, while disputes challenge the legal basis for privileging earlier intensive-revision dates and the differential treatment of identity documents, and raise concerns about booth-level discretion and sufficiency of notification reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:46:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Bihar SIR row: SC asks EC to publish details of 65 lakh deleted voters with reasons</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52531</link>
      <description>The electoral authority is ordered to publish the list of electors removed during the special intensive revision with specific reasons for non-inclusion displayed at local offices and widely publicised so affected persons may inspect deletions and approach poll officials with identity evidence for redress; the revisions cite reasons such as death, permanent shift/absence, and duplicate enrolment, while disputes challenge the legal basis for privileging earlier intensive-revision dates and the differential treatment of identity documents, and raise concerns about booth-level discretion and sufficiency of notification reasoning.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:46:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=52531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>