<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1792 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463211</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice issued after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior approval from the statutorily designated higher authority; approval only by the Joint Commissioner did not satisfy section 151(1), so the notice was without jurisdiction. Although the notice was dated 31.03.2021, electronic transmission and receipt on 01.04.2021 meant issuance occurred under the amended reopening regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and the pre-amended framework could not be applied; the reassessment action was therefore vitiated. The Tribunal also stated that section 40A(2)(b) does not apply to a co-operative society, so reopening on that basis was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 16:09:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=843402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1792 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463211</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice issued after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year required prior approval from the statutorily designated higher authority; approval only by the Joint Commissioner did not satisfy section 151(1), so the notice was without jurisdiction. Although the notice was dated 31.03.2021, electronic transmission and receipt on 01.04.2021 meant issuance occurred under the amended reopening regime introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and the pre-amended framework could not be applied; the reassessment action was therefore vitiated. The Tribunal also stated that section 40A(2)(b) does not apply to a co-operative society, so reopening on that basis was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>