<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (1) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45811</link>
    <description>Provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 must be strictly established by a manufacturer&#039;s request, the existence of alternative bases of assessment, and the requisite bond; later endorsement of forms or a subsequent bond did not make the original assessments provisional. For short-levied duty, Rule 10 applied as the specific recovery provision and required a written demand within three months of payment or account-current adjustment. Rule 10A could not be used as a residuary route to avoid that limitation. The demand notices were therefore time-barred and liable to be quashed, with consequential writ relief available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (1) TMI 3 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45811</link>
      <description>Provisional assessment under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 must be strictly established by a manufacturer&#039;s request, the existence of alternative bases of assessment, and the requisite bond; later endorsement of forms or a subsequent bond did not make the original assessments provisional. For short-levied duty, Rule 10 applied as the specific recovery provision and required a written demand within three months of payment or account-current adjustment. Rule 10A could not be used as a residuary route to avoid that limitation. The demand notices were therefore time-barred and liable to be quashed, with consequential writ relief available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>