<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45806</link>
    <description>Pending revisional proceedings over an adjudicated excise demand justified interim protection, and execution of the demand was stayed until the revisional authority decided the matter. The Court treated recovery as inappropriate in the circumstances while the revision remained unresolved and directed early disposal of the revisional application. Pending such disposal, the demand was not to be executed under Section 36 of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=84333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45806</link>
      <description>Pending revisional proceedings over an adjudicated excise demand justified interim protection, and execution of the demand was stayed until the revisional authority decided the matter. The Court treated recovery as inappropriate in the circumstances while the revision remained unresolved and directed early disposal of the revisional application. Pending such disposal, the demand was not to be executed under Section 36 of the Central Excises &amp; Salt Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>