https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45800 Full and candid disclosure of material facts is required when seeking ex parte discretionary writ relief; deliberate omissions or misstatements concerning relevant documents, goods and relationships justify refusal of relief. Customs confiscation proceedings need not follow the strict procedure of a criminal trial where the affected person knew the basis of the inquiry, participated through statements and documents, and showed no prejudice from the absence of a formal charge-sheet. Article 226 may be invoked against a confiscation order made after the Constitution commenced, even if seizure and inquiry began earlier, because the cause of action arises from the later order. The writ petition nevertheless failed due to suppression and no established breach of natural justice. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:29:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45800 Full and candid disclosure of material facts is required when seeking ex parte discretionary writ relief; deliberate omissions or misstatements concerning relevant documents, goods and relationships justify refusal of relief. Customs confiscation proceedings need not follow the strict procedure of a criminal trial where the affected person knew the basis of the inquiry, participated through statements and documents, and showed no prejudice from the absence of a formal charge-sheet. Article 226 may be invoked against a confiscation order made after the Constitution commenced, even if seizure and inquiry began earlier, because the cause of action arises from the later order. The writ petition nevertheless failed due to suppression and no established breach of natural justice. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Jun 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=45800